In Part 1, I looked at how model context protocols could reshape the customer profile, from static to dynamic, from collected to interpreted. In Part 2, I spoke about how that same shift could drive smarter, more human orchestration across channels and touchpoints.
But there’s a deeper layer we need to talk about. Not tech. Not tactics. Trust.
Because when our systems start inferring, remembering, and deciding → the stakes change. And our responsibilities as builders shift right along with them.
Dynamic Context == Dynamic Responsibility
With great memory comes great obligation.

Sorry, Uncle Ben.
When we move from static profiles